1. FinTalent
- Focus:
- Mortgage and finance broking only
- Model:
- Retained executive search
- Guarantee:
- 120 days
- Based:
- Melbourne, placed roles in every state
- Brokers placed:
- 20 mortgage brokers, 8 commercial finance brokers
- BDM placements published:
- None yet
- Broker-channel focus 7/10
- Broker fit 9/10
- Reach 7/10
- BDM evidence 3/10
Total26/40
A lending BDM's job is to get brokers writing with their lender, and FinTalent's entire business is brokers. It has placed 20 mortgage brokers and 8 commercial finance brokers, works with principal-led brokerages every day, and publishes six client reviews by name. That's why it scores 9 for broker fit, the highest here. When a lender is choosing between two BDM candidates, the useful question is which one the brokers actually rate, and FinTalent can answer that from the broker's side.
None of FinTalent's 54 published placements is a BDM. It lists BDMs among the roles it recruits, on both the lender and the broking side, and its BDM recruitment page sets out exactly what it looks for, but there's no BDM placement or case study to point to yet, so it scores 3 on evidence. Bluefin, Platinum People Group, Profusion and TOM People all have more BDM work on show, and Bluefin finishes a single point behind.
Otherwise it's a standard FinTalent search, retained, with a fee off base plus super and a 120-day guarantee. Joe Shephard runs every search himself and works a handful of briefs at a time, so a lender hiring a national BDM team in one go needs a bigger bench.
Joe Shephard's verdict: A BDM's CV tells you the panel they covered and the volume that went through it. It doesn't tell you whether brokers liked dealing with them, and brokers are the only customers a BDM has. Before a lender hires one, I'd want to hear from three brokers on that patch, the same way I'd check a broker's volume before an offer goes out. Then I'd judge them on activation, the settled volume and the brokers who send deals.